PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE PERITONEAL BIOPSY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF EXUDATIVE ASCITES
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous needle peritoneal biopsy in diagnosis of exudative ascites has gained wideacceptance and many workers have utilized it with a high diagnostic yield and no significantcomplications. Present study has been carried out to determine the efficacy of percutaneous needleperitoneal biopsy in the diagnosis of exudative ascites of unknown aetiology. Methods: It is a descriptivecase study conducted in Medical ‘C’ Unit, Lady Reading Hospital, Postgraduate Medical Institute, KhyberMedical University Peshawar over a period of 2 years, i.e., from Nov, 2003 to December 2005. A total of45 patients having unexplained exudative ascites underwent blind needle peritoneal biopsy. The biopsyspecimen was subjected to histopathology. Ascitic fluid was also obtained for analysis. Post biopsypatients were observed for 24 hours for any untoward complications. Results: A total of 45 patients (17male and 28 female) with age range from 20 to 65 years and having exudative ascites were studied. Thecommonest presentation of our patients was abdominal distension (93.3%), pain abdomen (46.67%), fever(44.4%) and weight loss (33.3%). Histopathology of the peritoneal biopsies was reported as follows.Eighteen cases (40%) showed non specific chronic inflammation, 10 (22.2%) cases showed caseatinggranulomatous inflammation suggestive of tuberculosis and 6 (13.3%) cases showed metastaticadenocarcinoma. In one patient peritoneal mesothelioma was reported. In the remaining10 patients(22.2%) biopsies were either non representative or inconclusive. The ascitic fluid showed predominantlylymphocytes in 86.6% of cases. Only three patients were reported to be having atypical cells on fluidcytology. The procedure was found safe. No patient was lost due to complications related to theprocedure. Only one patient had evidence of intra peritoneal bleed. The commonest problem post biopsywas pain (91.1%) and mild swelling (53.3%) at biopsy site. Conclusion: Peritoneal biopsy is fairly safeand inexpensive procedure with good diagnostic efficacy in patients with undiagnosed exudative ascites.Keywords: Peritoneal biopsy, Diagnosis, Exudative ascitesReferences
Donohoe RF, Schnidor BI and Gorman J. Needle biopsy of
the peritoneum. Arch Intern Med 1959;103:739–45.
Cope C, Bernhardt H. Hook-needle biopsy pleura,
pericardium, peritoneum and synovium. Am J Med
;35:189–95.
Levine H. Needle biopsy of peritoneum in exudative ascites.
Arch Intern Med.1967;120:542–5.
Chow KM, Chow VCY, Szeto CC. Indication for peritoneal
biopsy in tuberculous peritonitis. Am J Surg 2003;185:567–73.
Shah IA, Haq NU, Hayat Z, Humayoon M, Shah NH.
Percutaneous Needle biopsy in exudative Ascites. J Pak Med
Assoc 1996;46:260–1.
Kenneth R, McQuaid MD. Disease of the peritoneum. In:
Mcphee SJ, Papadakis MA,eds. Current medical diagnostic
and treatment 46th ed. New York: Lange Medical
Book/McGraw-Hill, 2007;p. 571–3.
Glickman RM. Abdominal swelling and ascites. In: Kasper
DL, Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Longo DL, and
Jameson JL, eds. Harrison, Principles of internal medicine
th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005;p. 243–6.
Sotoudehmanesh R, Shirazian N, Asgari AA, Malekzadeh R.
Tuberculous peritonitis in an endemic area. Dig Liver Dis
;35(1):37–40.
Gasim B, Fedail SS. Ha Keem SE. Peritoneoscopy:
Experience in Sudan. Trop Gastroenterol 2002;23(2):57–60.
Bilgin T, Karaby A, Dolar E, Develioglu OH. Peritoneal
tuberculosis with pelvic abdominal mass, ascites and elevated
CA 125 mimicking advanced ovarian carcinoma: a series of
cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001;11:290–4.
Schwake L, Von Herbay A, Junghanss T, Stremmel W,
Mueller M. Peritoneal tuberculosis with negative polymerase
chain reaction results: report of two cases. Scand J
Gastroenterol 2003;38:221–4.
Ramanathan M, wahinuddin S, Safari E, Sellaiah SP.
Abdominal tuberculosis: A presumptive Diagnosis.
Singapore Med J 1997;38(9):364–8.
Jenkins Pf and Ward MJ. The role of peritoneal biopsy in the
diagnosis of ascites. Postgrad Med J. 1990;56:702–3.
Luck NH, Khan AA, Alam A, Butt AK, Shafquat F. Role of
Laparoscopy in the diagnosis of low serum ascites albumin
gradient. J Pak Med Assoc 2007;57:33–4.
Vardareli E, Kebapci M, Saricam T, Pasaoglu O, Acikalin M.
Tuberculous peritonitis of the wet ascitic type: clinical
features and diagnostic value of image-guided peritoneal
biopsy. Dig Liver Dis 2004;36(3):175–7.
Al-Amri SM, Rahmatulla RH, Al-Bozom IA. Malignant
peritoneal Mesothelioma. Saudi Med J 2000;21(3):291–3.
Uygur-Bayramicli O, Dabak G, Dabak R. A clinical
dilemma: Abdominal tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol
;9:1098–101.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
