ROLE OF TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY IN ASSESSMENT OF ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING IN PERIMENOPAUSAL AGE GROUP
Abstract
Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common problem which prompts morethan 20% of all visits to outpatient clinics, and may account for more than 25% of allhysterectomies. The objective of this study was to determine the role of transvaginalultrasonography in women of perimenopausal age group presenting with abnormal uterinebleeding. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in Department of Obstructs andGynaecology, Railway General Hospital, Rawalpindi. One hundred and forty-one women whoattended the gynaecology clinic with abnormal uterine bleeding (menorrhagia, intermenstrualbleeding, or postcoital bleeding) between 40–47 years of age from January 2006 and April 2007were included in this study. The mean age was 44 years. Results: Among 141 womenendometrial lesions were detected in 77 cases on histopathology after Dialatation and Curettage(D&C), while 57 (40.42%) of these were confirmed on transvaginal ultrasongraphy as anendometrial pathology prior to this invasive procedure. Among the 64 remaining patients,showing normal proliferative endometrium on histopathology, 46 cases (71.87%) showed noabnormality on tranvaginal examination. Conclusion: Transvaginal sonography can be safelyused as an initial investigation in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding as it is a noninvasive procedure for the detection of endometrial pathology. The incidence of detection of anabnormal pathology by ultrasongraphy is high when focal lesions as fibroids, polyps or foreignbody is concerned. Dilatation and curettage being a blind procedure requires hospitalization andgeneral anaesthesia which can be safely replaced by an alternate valid, safe and non-invasivetechnique for evaluating the endometrial pathology in women of perimenopausal age group withabnormal uterine bleeding.Keywords: Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB), Transvaginal Sonography (TVS), Dilatation andCurettage (D&C), PerimenopasualReferences
Munro MG. Abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive years.
Part II: Medical management. J Am Assoc. Gynecol Laparosc
;7:17–35.
Schappert SM. Ambulatory care visits to physician offices,
hospital outpatients and emergencydepartments: United States,
National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics
;134:1–37.
McCluggage WG. My approach to the interpretation of
endometrial biopsies and curettings, J Clin Pathol
;59:801–12.
Munro MG. Abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive years.
Part I .Pathogenesis and clinical investigations. J Am Assoc.
Gynecol Laparosc 1999;6:391–428.
Conoscenti G, Meir YJ, Fischer-Tamaro L, Maieron A, Natale R,
D'Ottavio G, et al. Endometrial assessment by transvaginal
sonography and histological findings after D&C in women with
postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
;61:8–115.
Bakour S, Khan S, Gupta JK. The risk of premalignant and
malignant pathology in endometrial polyps. Aca Obstet Gynecol
Scand 2000;79:317–20.
Kelly P, Dobbs S, McCluggage W. Endometrial hyperplasia
involving endometrial polyps: report of a series & discussion in
an endometrial biopsy specimen; BJOG 2007;114:944–50.
Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh PA, Sandler B, Hofmann G, Navot
D. High resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the
endometrium: a noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy.
Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:200–4.
Smith P, Bakos O, Heimer G, Ulmsten U. Transvaginal
ultrasound for identifying endometrial abnormality. Acta Obstet
Gynae Scand 1991;70:591–4.
Bakos O, Heimer G. Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of
endometrium related to histological findings in pre-ad perimenopausal women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1998;45:199–204.
Dijkhuizen FP, Brolmann HA, Potters AE, Bongers MY, Heinz
AP. The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography in the
diagnosis of endometrial abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol
;87:345–9.
Emanuel MH, Warmstaker K, Lannes FB. A prospective
comparison of transvaginal sonography and diagnostic
hysteroscopy in evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine
bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:547–52.
Saha TK, Amer SA, Biss J, Thakare H, Williams S, Farrell CT,
Calvert J.. The validity of transvaginal ultrasound measurement
of endometrial thickness: a comparison of ultrasound
measurement with direct anatominal measurement. BJOG
;111:1419–24.
Gvanberg S, Wikland M, Karlgson B, Norstrom A, Friberg LG.
Endometrial thickness as measurement by endometrial
ultrasonography for identifying endometrial abnormality. Am J
Obstet Gynaecol 1991;164:47–52.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(1)
http://www.ayubmed.edu.pk/JAMC/PAST/22-1/Riffat.pdf
Spandorfer SD, Arrendondo-Soberon F, Loret de Mola JR,
Feringbang RF. Reliability of intraobserver and intraobserver
sonographic endometrial stripe thickness measurments. Fertil
Steril 1998;70:152–4.
Fleischer AC, Kalemeris GC, Machin JE, Entman SS, James
AE Jr. Sonographic depiction of normal and abnormal
endometrium with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound
Med 1986;5:445–52.
Smith Brindman R , Kerlikowske K, Felstein VA, Subak L,
Scheidler J, Segal M, et al. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude
endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA
;280:1510–7.
Karlsson B, Gvanberg S, Metal W. Ylöstalo P, Torvid K, Marsal
K, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography of endometrium in
women with postmenopausal bleeding. a Nordic multi-centre
study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1488–94.
Di Naro E, Bratta FG, Romano F, Caradonna F, Loizzi P.
The diagnosis of benign uterine pathology using transvaginal
endohysterosonography. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol
;23:103–7.
Delisle MF, Villeneuve M, Bonlvain M. measurement of
endometrial thickness with transvaginal ultrasonography: is it
reproducible? J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:481–4.
Langer RD, Pierce JJ, O’Hanlan KA, Johnson SR, Espeland MA,
Trabal JF, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with
endometrial biopsy for detection of endometrial disease. N Engl.
J. Med 1997;337:1792–8.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.