DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN MENISCAL INJURIES OF KNEE JOINT AND ITS ROLE IN SELECTION OF PATIENTS FOR ARTHROSCOPY
Abstract
Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is frequently advised to evaluate clinically suspectedcases of meniscal injuries in our setup. The objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI inmeniscal injuries of knee joint and its effectiveness in selection of patients for arthroscopy. Methods: ACross-sectional comparative study was conducted at Radiology Department Military Hospital (MH)Rawalpindi in collaboration with Orthopaedic Department Combined Military Hospital (CMH)Rawalpindi from 31 Jan 2007 to 1 Aug 2007. Fifty-seven patients with clinical suspicion of meniscalinjuries were subjected to MRI. Arthroscopy was done only in 34 patients while 23 were excluded on thebasis of MRI findings. MRI findings were compared with arthroscopic findings. Medial and lateralmenisci were considered separately in each case. Results: Among 57 patients only 30 showed significanttear on MRI. Arthroscopy was done in these cases. Arthroscopy was considered on clinical grounds onlyin 4 patients who did not show significant tear on MRI. MRI showed Medial Meniscus (MM) injury in23 patients and Lateral Meniscus (LM) injury in 10 patients. Arthroscopy confirmed MM injury in 17patients and LM injury in 7 patients. MRI missed two MM and one LM injuries. This showed that MRIhas sensitivity of 89.4% and specificity of 62% in diagnosing injuries of MM, while sensitivity of 87%and specificity of 88% in diagnosing injuries of LM. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in MM and LMinjuries was 76.4% and 88.2% respectively. Conclusion: MRI is accurate in diagnosing meniscalinjuries of knee joint and is effective in selection of patients for arthroscopy.Keywords: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Meniscal injuries, ArthroscopyReferences
Johnson MJ, Lucas GL, Dusek JK. Isolated arthroscopic
meniscal repair: a long-term outcome study (more than 10
years). Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:44–9
Fairbanks TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone
Joint Surg Br 1948;30:664–70
Thornton DD, Rubin DA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the
knee menisci. Semin Roentgenol 2000;35:217–30.
Helms CA. The meniscus: recent advances in MR imaging of
the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1115–22.
Ahmad M, Ayub Z, Hadi N. Prevalence of various types of
intra-articular injuries detected by Magnetic resonance imaging
in trauma to the knee joint. J Med Sci 2005;13:136–9.
Shetty DS, Lakhkar BN, Krishna GK. Magnetic Resonance
Imaging in Pathological Conditions of Knee. Ind J Radiol Imag
;12:375–87.
Koski JA, Ibarra C, Rodeo SA. Meniscal injury and repair:
clinical status. Orthop Clin North Am 2000;31:419–36.
Bin SI, Kim JM, Shin SJ. Radial tears of the posterior horn of
the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:373–8.
Kocabey Y, Tetik O, Isbell WM, Atay OA, Johnson DL. The
value of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance
imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate
ligament rupture. Arthroscopy 2004;20:696–700.
Ryan PJ, Reddy K, Fleeteroft J. A prospective comparison of
clinical examination, MRI, bone SPECT, and arthroscopy to
detect meniscal tears. Clin Nucl Med 1999;23:803–6.
Major MM, Beard LN, Helms CA. Accuracy of MRI of knee
in adolescent. AJR. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:17–9.
Khanda GE, Akhtar W, Ahsan H, Ahmad N. Assessment of
menisci and ligamentous injuries of the knee on magnetic
resonance imaging: correlation with arthroscopy. J Pak Med
Assoc 2008;58:537–40.
Zairul-Nizam ZF, Hyzan MY, Gobinder S, Razak MA. The
role of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in internal
derangement of the knee. Med J Malaysia.2000;55:433–8
Elvenes J, Jerome CP, Reikeras O. Magnetic resonance
imaging as a screening procedure to avoid arthroscopy for
meniscal tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:14–6.
Williams RL, Williams LA, Watura R, Fairclough JA. Impact
of MRI on a knee arthroscopy waiting list. Ann R Coll Surg
Engl 1996;78:450–2
Vincken PW, Braak BP, Erkel AR, Rooy TP, Mallens WM, Post
W, et al. Effectiveness of MR imaging in selection of patients for
arthroscopy of the knee. Radiology 2002;223:739–46.
Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of Meniscal Tears. AJR Am
J Roentgenol 2006;187:371–5g
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(4)
http://www.ayubmed.edu.pk/JAMC/PAST/22-4/Asif.pdf
Antonio GE, Griffith JF, Yeung DK. Small-field-of-view MRI
of the knee and ankle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:24–8.
Rubin DA, Paletta GA. Current concepts and controversies in
meniscal imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N
Am 2000;8:243–70.
Brooks S, Morgan M. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in knee
arthroscopy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002;84:265–8.
Bryan S, Bungay HP, Weatherburn G, Field S. Magnetic
resonance imaging for investigation of the knee joint : a clinical
and economic evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care
;20:222–9.
Bui-Mansfield LT. Potential cost savings of MR imaging
obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: evolution of 50
consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:913–8.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.