COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTING FRACTURES IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE A CLINICAL SUSPICION
Keywords:
Ultrasonography, Conventional Radiography, Fracture Detection, Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Suspicion, Imaging ModalitiesAbstract
Background: Fracture detection plays a crucial role in clinical settings, influencing patient management and treatment decisions. Traditional methods, such as conventional radiography, have been the standard for fracture imaging. However, with advancements in technology, ultrasonography has emerged as a potential alternative, offering benefits such as portability and the absence of ionizing radiation. This study aims to compare the accuracy of ultrasonography and conventional radiography in identifying fractures in individuals presenting with clinical suspicion. The primary objective of this study is to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and conventional radiography in detecting fractures. By evaluating both imaging modalities, we aim to provide insights into the potential utility of ultrasonography as a viable option for fracture diagnosis, particularly in cases where conventional radiography may present limitations. Methods: This prospective comparative study involves individuals with a clinical suspicion of fractures, who will undergo both ultrasonography and conventional radiography. The imaging results will be independently assessed by experienced radiologists blinded to the clinical information. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy will be calculated for both modalities. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, will be employed to determine significant differences between the two methods. Results: Preliminary results indicate that ultrasonography demonstrates comparable accuracy to conventional radiography in detecting fractures. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy will be presented, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality. Any statistically significant differences between the two methods will be discussed in detail. Conclusion: This study contributes valuable insights into the comparative accuracy of ultrasonography and conventional radiography in fracture detection among individuals with clinical suspicion. The findings aim to guide healthcare professionals in making informed decisions regarding the choice of imaging modality based on the clinical context and available resources.References
Yildirim H, Oruç OA. Comparison of ultrasonography and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of extremity fractures in the emergency department. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 2023;6(1):25–9.
Tsou PY, Ma YK, Wang YH, Gillon JT, Rafael J, Deanehan JK. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for upper extremity fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2021;44:383–94.
Zamani M, Mazaheri M, Heydari F, Masoumi B. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasonography and radiography for calcaneal fractures in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma 2021;7(1):17–21.
Rahman F, Alam SR, Shoaib M, Khalil A, Gul N, Gudaro ZN. A critical analysis of detection in bony fractures of conventional radiography with ultrasound. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 2023 Jun 5:1–7.
Alam SR, Rahman F, Zafar H, Mazhar M, Ali N, Ahmed W. Examination of detection of conventional radiography in bony fractures. NeuroQuantology. 2023;21(6):809.
Nath P, Menon S, Suresh A, Archana S. Comparison of ultrasonography with conventional radiography in diagnosis of zygomatic complex fractures. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 2020;19:307–13.
Snelling PJ, Jones P, Bade D, Bindra R, Davison M, Gillespie A, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Versus Radiographic Imaging for Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2023 Nov 22.
Li E, Tan Q. Role of ultrasound imaging to assess and diagnose various body fractures: Systemic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 2022;15(3):357–64.
Snelling PJ, Jones P, Keijzers G, Bade D, Herd DW, Ware RS. Nurse practitioner administered point-of-care ultrasound compared with X-ray for children with clinically non-angulated distal forearm fractures in the ED: a diagnostic study. Emergency Medicine Journal 2021;38(2):139–45.
Ackermann O, Simanowski J, Eckert K. Fracture ultrasound of the extremities. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound 2020;41(1):12–28.
Caroselli C, Zaccaria E, Blaivas M, Dib G, Fiorentino R, Longo D. A pilot prospective study to validate point-of-care ultrasound in comparison to X-ray examination in detecting fractures. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2020;46(1):11–9.
Gilbertson J, Pageau P, Ritcey B, Cheng W, Burwash-Brennan T, Perry JJ, et al. Test characteristics of chest ultrasonography for rib fractures following blunt chest trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2022;79(6):529–39.
Krastman P, Mathijssen NM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Kraan G, Runhaar J. Diagnostic accuracy of history taking, physical examination and imaging for phalangeal, metacarpal and carpal fractures: a systematic review update. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2020 Dec;21:1-24.
Karmazyn B, Marine MB, Wanner MR, Delaney LR, Cooper ML, Shold AJ, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of classic metaphyseal lesions using radiographs as the gold standard. Pediatric Radiology 2020;50:1123–30.
Troxler D, Sanchez C, de Trey T, Mayr J, Walther M. Non-Inferiority of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Compared to Radiography to Diagnose Upper Extremity Fractures in Children. Children 2022;9(10):1496.
Ashoobi MA, Rad EH, Rahimi R. The diagnostic value of sonographic findings in pediatric elbow fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2023 Dec 20.
Dar SR, Ahmad A, Mukhtar S, Tanoli AA, Khan ZG, Siddiqa I. A Comparison of Conventional Radiography With Ultrasound For The Detection Of Bony Fractures. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 2023:3032–8.
Knight J, Alves-Pereira F, Keen CE, Jaremko JL. 2D vs. 3D Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures. Children 2023;10(11):1766.
Knight J. 2D/3D ultrasound diagnosis of pediatric distal radius fractures by human readers vs artificial intelligence. Sci. Rep. 13, 14535 (2023).
Syrop I, Fukushima Y, Mullins K, Raiser S, Lawley R, Bosshardt L, et al. Comparison of Ultrasonography to MRI in the Diagnosis of Lower Extremity Bone Stress Injuries: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2022;41(11):2885–96.
Sripanich Y, Weinberg MW, Krähenbühl N, Rungprai C, Mills MK, Saltzman CL, et al. Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review. Skeletal Radiology 2020;49:31–53.
Mobasseri A, Noorifard P. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of pediatric distal radius fractures: does it really change the treatment policy? An orthopedic view. Journal of Ultrasonography 2022;22(90):e179–82.
Gökçen E, Savrun A, Kuşdoğan M, Çaltekin İ, Albayrak L, Atik D, et al. Ability of Bedside Ultrasonography to Detect Pediatric Nasal Bone Fractures. The Laryngoscope 2021 ;131(6):1398–403.
Sepuya RG, Dozeman ET, Prittie JE, Fischetti AJ, Weltman JG. Comparing diagnostic findings and cost of whole body computed tomography to traditional diagnostic imaging in polytrauma patients. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 2022;32(3):334–40.
Gottlieb M, Patel D, Marks A, Peksa GD. Ultrasound for the diagnosis of shoulder dislocation and reduction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Academic Emergency Medicine 2022;29(8):999–1007.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sadia Naseer Qazi, Adil Qyyum, Nisar Ahmad, Ruqqia Adil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
