ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION – AN IMPROVED PATHWAY THAN CONVENTIONAL CARE FOR REDUCING HOSPITAL STAY

Authors

  • Uzma Afreen Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, PAF Hospital, Faisal Karachi-Pakistan
  • Fazal e Karim Faisal Department of Anaesthesiology, Fazaia Medical College, PAF Islamabad-Pakistan
  • Maliha Khalid Khan Department of Anaesthesiology, PAF Hospital, Mushaf Sargodha-Pakistan
  • Zahid Akhtar Rao Department of Anaesthesiology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, PAF Hospital, Faisal Karachi-Pakistan
  • Rozina Mustafa Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, PAF Hospital, Faisal Karachi-Pakistan
  • Sanober Afreen Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Police Hospital Karachi-Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-01-12522

Abstract

Background: With the help of an evidence-based approach called “Enhanced Recovery After Surgery” (ERAS), patients can receive standardised perioperative care and recover more quickly. Many surgical specialties, such as orthopaedics, gynaecological onco-surgery, breast surgery, urology, and colorectal surgery, use ERAS protocols extensively. Improved postoperative recovery has been shown to be beneficial in lowering hospital stays, costs, and increasing patient satisfaction. This study sought to determine whether the application of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients having an elective caesarean section would improve the patients’ postoperative status regarding pain management, length of stay in the hospital and expenses associated with complications. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in PAF Hospital Faisal, Karachi. Women scheduled for elective caesarean sections were enrolled in the cross-sectional study from February 2023 to July 2023, and they were compared to women who had caesarean sections during the same time period and received conventional perioperative care. Patients with medical or surgical comorbidities, as well as women who had emergency or urgent caesarean sections, were excluded. The surgical method was same in both ERAS and non-ERAS arms. Intravenous hydration was used to achieve a specific purpose. After 4 hours, liquids were introduced, followed by solids after 6 hours. Intravenous paracetamol and intramuscular diclofenac were given regularly. After 6-8 hours, the Foleys catheter was withdrawn. The conventional care group fasted for 6 hours before and after surgery. The catheter was left in place for 24 hours, and 2500 ml of intravenous fluids were administered on the first day, followed by 1000 ml on the second. The length of hospital stay was determined by clinical criteria and the discretion of the care providers. Results: In contrast to the conventional care group, the ERAS arm experienced a much shorter post-operative hospital stay. (p-value= 0.001; 33.42 vs. 61.30 hours). The patient quickly recovered due to early eating, early ambulation, early catheter removal, multimodal pain management, and pre-emptive analgesia and antibiotic administration. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol has been shown to be beneficial in lowering postoperative pain and nausea, the average cost of hospitalization, and improving patient satisfaction. It seems to be worth implementing this protocol widely among patients undergoing elective caesarean sections

Author Biographies

Uzma Afreen, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, PAF Hospital, Faisal Karachi-Pakistan

 

Fazal e Karim Faisal, Department of Anaesthesiology, Fazaia Medical College, PAF Islamabad-Pakistan

 

Maliha Khalid Khan, Department of Anaesthesiology, PAF Hospital, Mushaf Sargodha-Pakistan

 

Zahid Akhtar Rao, Department of Anaesthesiology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, PAF Hospital, Faisal Karachi-Pakistan

 

Rozina Mustafa, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, PAF Hospital, Faisal Karachi-Pakistan

 

Sanober Afreen, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Police Hospital Karachi-Pakistan

 

References

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology ofuse of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018;392(10155):1341–8.

Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, et al. Method ofdelivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey onmaternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet 2010;375(9713):490–9.

Quinlan JD, Murphy NJ. Cesarean delivery: counseling issues andcomplication management. Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(3):178–84.

Li JX. Pain and depression comorbidity: a preclinical perspective. Behav Brain Res 2015;276:92–8.

Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health 2018;18(1):613.

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997;78(5):606–617.

Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 2008;371(9615):791–3.

Slim K, Kehlet H. Commentary: fast track surgery: the need for improved study design. Colorectal Dis 2012;14(8):1013–4.

Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, et al. Guidelines for antenataland preoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery aftersurgery society recommendations (Part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219(6):e521–3.e515.

Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgerysociety recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219(6):533–44.

Pedziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Wierdak M, Major P, Rubinkiewicz M, Kisielewski M, et al. The use of theEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in patientsundergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer–a comparativeanalysis of patients aged above 80 and below 55. Pol J Surg 2015;87(11):565–72.

Teigen NC, Sahasrabudhe N, Doulaveris G, Xie X, Negassa A, Bernstein J, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery at cesarean delivery to reduce postoperative length of stay: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222(4):e1–372.

Baluku M, Bajunirwe F, Ngonzi J, Kiwanuka J, Ttendo S. A randomized controlled trial of enhanced recovery after surgery versus standard of care recovery for emergency cesarean deliveries at Mbarara Hospital, Uganda. Anesth Analg 2020;130(3):769–76.

Wrench IJ, Allison A, Galimberti A, Radley S, Wilson MJ. Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth 2015;24(2):124–30.

Bowden SJ, Dooley W, Hanrahan J, Kanu C, Halder S, Cormack C, et al. Fast-track pathway for elective caesarean section: a quality improvement initiative to promote day 1 discharge. BMJ Open Qual 2019;8(2):e000465.

Ong CKS, Seymour RA, Lirk P, Merry AF. Combining paracetamol (Acetaminophen) with Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a qualitative systematic review of analgesic efficacy for acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 2010;110(4):1170–9.

Fusco P, Scimia P, Paladini G, Fiorenzi M, Petrucci E, Pozone T, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after cesarean delivery. A systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol 2015;81(2):195–204.

Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221(3):247.e1–247.e9.

Abdel-Aleem H, Aboelnasr MF, Jayousi TM, Habib FA. Indwelling bladder catheterisation as part of intraoperative and postoperative care for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014(4):CD010322.

Basbug A, Yuksel A, Ellibeş KA. Early versus delayed removal of indwelling catheters in patients after elective cesarean section: a prospective randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020;33(1):68–72.

Izbizky GH, Minig L, Sebastiani MA, Otaño L. The effect of early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding on women’s satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2008;115(3):332–8.

Chantarasorn V, Tannirandorn Y. A comparative study of early postoperative feeding versus conventional feeding for patients undergoing cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thail 2006;89(Suppl 4):S11–6.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-05