EFFICACY OF CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF EARLY POST-TRAUMATIC CEREBROSPINAL FLUID RHINORRHEA

Authors

  • Shahbaz Ali Khan Department of Neurosurgery, Ayub Medical & Institute Abbottabad-Pakistan
  • Bilal Ahmad
  • Muhammad Sajjad
  • Mushtaq Ahmed
  • Arshad Khan
  • Adil Ahsan
  • Attiya Nasir Siddique
  • Abdul Aziz Khan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-S1-10564

Abstract

Background: The incidence of Post-traumatic Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhoea (PCSFR) has been decreased due to advanced therapeutic measures. The current investigative study has been arranged to assess the efficacy of conservative management of early PCSFR. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at departmental of Neurosurgery, Ayub Medical Institute, Abbottabad. Patients with traumatic brain injury having Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea with either gender having age 5–50 year and presenting within seven days of traumatic brain injury were included. Moreover, those with nasal fractures, penetrating head injuries having fever and neck stiffness were also included in the study. Results: A total number of 120 patients having male dominancy, i.e., 86 (72%) were included in the study with the mean age of 27 years ± 8.741 in which 77 (92%) patients were in the age range of 2nd to 4th decades. The commonest cause was trauma due to Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) having 65 (54%) patients. Conservative treatment was effective in 62 (52%) patients predominantly in the patients of 3rd decade, i.e., 31 (50%), in which the effectiveness in male gender was revealed to be 52.32% (45) and effectiveness in RTA patients was recorded to be 54.83%. Similarly, the Chi-Square value was calculated for the PCSFR patients for four groups of patients (5–20, 21–30, 31–40, 41–50) to be 48.27 having critical value of 7.81 with the p-value of 1.87e-10, which completely rejects the Null-hypothesis for the patients of various ages. Conclusion: Based on the current investigative study, it may be concluded that PCSFR is common in middle age population with slight male dominancy. It may also be inferred that RTA is the leading cause of PCSFR in our set up and majority of the patients shows improvement after conservative management. Moreover, the effectiveness of conservative management of PCSFR could be predominantly observed in the patients of 3rd decade.

References

Deenadayal D, Vidyasagar D, Kumar MN, Sudhakshin P, Chandra SS, Hameed S. Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhoea our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65(Suppl 2):271–5.

Kalhoro A, Samad A, Javeed F, Hassan S, Rehman L. Post-traumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea and Transcranial approach surgical outcomes. Prof Med J 2021;28(06):891–5.

Hai-sheng L, Ye-tao C, Dong W, Hui L, Yunpeng W, Shi-jie W, et al. The use of topical intranasal fluorescein in endoscopic endonasal repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Surg Neurol 2009;72(4):341–5.

Daele J, Goffart Y, Machiels S. Traumatic, iatrogenic, and spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak: endoscopic repair. B-ENT 2011;7(Suppl 17):47–60.

Chow JM, Goodman D, Mafee MF. Evaluation of CSF rhinorrhoea by computerized tomography with metrizamide. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;100(2):99–105.

Yadav YR, Parihar V, Janakiram N, Pande S, Bajaj J, Namdev H. Endoscopic management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Asian J Neurosurg 2016;11(3):183.

Kljajić V, Vuleković P, Vlaški L, Savović S, Dragičević D, Papić V. Endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2017;83(4)388–93.

Mathias T, Levy J, Fatakia A, McCoul ED. Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Ochsner J 2016;16(2):136–42.

Oakley GM, Alt JA, Schlosser RJ, Harvey RJ, Orlandi RR. Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea: an evidence‐based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allerg Rhinol 2016:6(1)8–16.

Yadav JS, Francis AA. CSF rhinorrhoea-feasibility of conservative management in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75(2):186–9.

Oakley GM, Orlandi RR, Woodworth BA, Batra PS, Alt JA. Management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea: an evidence‐based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allerg Rhinol 2016:6(1)17–24.

Lee TJ, Huang CC, Chuang CC, Huang SF. Transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea and skull base defect: ten‐year experience. Laryngoscope 2004;114(8):1475–81.

Yeo NK, Cho GS, Kim CJ, Lim GC, Jang YJ, Lee BJ, Chung YS. The effectiveness of lumbar drainage in the conservative and surgical treatment of traumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Acta Otolaryngol 2012;133(1):82–90.

Zlab MK, Moore GF, Daly DT, Yonkers AJ. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea: a review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J 1992;71(7):314–7.

Tilak AM, Koehn H, Mattos J, Payne SC. Preoperative management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea with acetazolamide. Int Forum Allerg Rhinol 2019:9(3)265–9.

Schoentgen C, Henaux PL, Godey B, Jegoux F. Management of post-traumatic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak of anterior skull base: 10 years experience. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133(9):944–50.

Friedman JA, Ebersold MJ, Quast LM. Post-traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leakage. World J Surg 2001;25(8):1062–6.

Brodie HA, Thompson TC. Management of complications from 820 temporal bone fractures. Am J Otol 1997;18(2):188–97.

Satti SA, Ramooz K, Malik MU, Akhtar N, Shahzad Y. Post traumatic CSF fistulas--A solved problem? Prof Med J 2021;28(5):630–4.

Vamanshankar H, Hegde JS. Traumatic CSF rhinorrhoea. CSF Rhinorrhoea: Management and Practice. 2020; p.23–30.

Published

2022-06-24

Most read articles by the same author(s)