MITCHELL-BANKS’ VS. FERGUSON AND GROSS HERNIOTOMY IN BOYS OVER TWO: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Naveed Ahmad Women Medical College
  • Ulas Khan
  • Tallat Shahzad
  • Mudassar Sajjad
  • Hamza Ashraf
  • Maryam Imran
  • Aneeq Iqbal

Keywords:

Inguinal Hernia; Herniotomy; Pediatrics; Scrotal Edema; Surgical Outcomes; Recurrence

Abstract

Background: Inguinal hernia repair in boys traditionally employs Ferguson and Gross Herniotomy (FGH) for older children and Mitchell-Banks’ Herniotomy (MBH) for younger ones, though this age-based distinction is increasingly debated. Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes—primarily scrotal edema—between MBH and FGH in boys over two years of age. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 136 boys older than two years underwent primary inguinal herniotomy from January 2022 to December 2024 (MBH: 62; FGH: 74). Scrotal edema was assessed clinically on postoperative days 1 and 7. Secondary outcomes included operative time, six-month recurrence, testicular atrophy, and surgical site infection. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: MBH was associated with a significantly higher incidence of scrotal edema on day 1 (40.3% vs. 5.4%) and day 7 (16.1% vs. 2.7%) (both p<0.05). However, MBH showed shorter operative duration (17.3 ± 3.5 vs. 20.4 ± 4.6 minutes, p<0.001) and lower recurrence rates (1.6% vs. 6.8%, p=0.038). Rates of testicular atrophy and surgical site infection were low and comparable between groups. Conclusion: Despite a higher rate of transient scrotal edema, MBH offers advantages in operative efficiency and recurrence reduction, suggesting it may be a suitable option in older children. Further randomized studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

References

1. Baird R, Puligandla PS, Laberge JM. Inguinal Hernia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 May 26]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513332/

2. Chang SJ, Chen JY, Hsu CK, Chuang FC, Yang SS. The incidence of inguinal hernia and associated risk factors of incarceration in paediatric inguinal hernia: a nation-wide longitudinal population-based study. Hernia. 2016;20(4):559-63. doi:10.1007/s10029-016-1486-3.

3. Kapur P, Caty MG, Glick PL. Pediatric hernias and hydroceles. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;45(4):773-89. doi:10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70048-0.

4. Shahid A, Afzal A, Saeed M, et al. Comparison between Ferguson’s technique and Mitchell-Banks technique for inguinal herniotomy in children. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2023;73(4):1228-31.

5. Nithin KV, Narayana SM. Comparison of Gross and Ferguson versus Mitchell-Banks herniotomy techniques in children: a quasi-experimental study. Medica Innovatica. 2022;11(1):25-9.

6. Almaramhy HH. Open versus laparoscopic repair for paediatric inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2024;90:102636. doi:10.1016/j.epsc.2023.102636

7. Ahmad HM, Naumeri F, Saud U, Butt G. Comparison of Ferguson and Gross herniotomy with Mitchell-Banks’ herniotomy in boys older than two years. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):40-4. doi:10.12669/pjms.37.1.3307

8. Moeezah Z, Shahid M, Ikram M, et al. Comparison between outcomes of inguinal herniotomy by Mitchell-Bank and modified Ferguson technique for paediatric inguinal hernia. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2024;31(1):e10-6.

9. Holland-Cunz S, Keller KM, Rauh P. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain after pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:11700912. doi:10.3389/fped.2023.11700912

10. Oyetunji TA, Nwomeh BC. A retrospective nationwide comparison of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2024;59(3):352-8. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.007

11. Türk E, Memetoglu ME, Edirne Y, et al. Inguinal herniotomy with the Mitchell-Banks’ technique is safe in older children. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(7):1159-60. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.09.065

12. Jain N, Sarin YK. To compare Gross & Ferguson and Mitchell-Banks repair techniques in children with congenital inguinal hernia. Medica Innovatica. 2022;11(1):45-50.

13. Kim SH, Lee HK, Lee YJ, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of testicular loss or atrophy after incarcerated inguinal hernia in paediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol. 2024;54(3):391-6. doi:10.1007/s00247-023-05620-3

14. Girdhar A, Berman L, Sosa JA, et al. Pediatric surgical site infections in 287 hospitals in the United States, 2015–2018. J Pediatr Surg. 2023;58(2):318-26. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.12.012

Downloads

Published

2026-01-09

How to Cite

1.
Ahmad N, Ulas Khan, Tallat Shahzad, Sajjad M, Ashraf H, Imran M, et al. MITCHELL-BANKS’ VS. FERGUSON AND GROSS HERNIOTOMY IN BOYS OVER TWO: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 9 [cited 2026 Jan. 11];37(3):330-3. Available from: https://www.jamc.ayubmed.edu.pk/index.php/jamc/article/view/14521

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 3 (2026): JOURNAL OF AYUB MEDICAL COLLEGE ABBOTTABAD

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Naveed Ahmad, Ulas Khan, Tallat Shahzad, Mudassar Sajjad, Hamza Ashraf, Maryam Imran, Aneeq Iqbal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.