COMPUTATION OF THE GAP SIZE AT THE MARGINAL INTERFACE OF TWO TYPES OF FISSURE SEALANTS: AN IN VITRO EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Authors

  • Tabinda Nawaz Khan Department of Science of Dental Materials, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi-Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-9518
  • Farhan Raza Khan Dental Section, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi-Pakistan
  • Muhammad Fahad Riaz Metallurgy and Materials Engineering Department, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi (DUET)-Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-01-13067

Keywords:

marginal gaps,, SEM, sealants, RMGIC

Abstract

Background: The occlusal surface, prone to dental caries due to pits and fissures formed by imperfect enamel coalescence, is commonly protected using fissure sealants. This study evaluated the gap size at the tooth-sealant interface for two sealant types, with and without enameloplasty. Methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted at Dow Dental College, Karachi. Forty-four extracted human molars and premolars were divided into four subgroups based on sealant type—light-cured flowable resin-based or resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)—and whether enameloplasty was performed. Specimens underwent thermocycling, sectioning, drying, and gold sputtering. They were examined at 50× magnification using scanning electron microscopy. Slides showing gaps between sealants and tooth structures were analyzed. One-way ANOVA tested the mean gap differences, with significance set at p≤0.05. Results: The overall mean gap observed was 22.38±14.33 µm. The largest gap (30.68±17.76 µm) appeared in RMGIC without enameloplasty; the smallest (12.12±7.03 µm) in flowable resin with enameloplasty. RMGIC with enameloplasty and flowable resin without enameloplasty showed comparable mean gap sizes (20.51±8.04 µm). Differences among groups were statistically significant (p=0.007). Conclusion: Flowable resin-based sealants created smaller marginal gaps than RMGIC. Enameloplasty significantly reduced gaps in both sealant types, with the most pronounced improvement observed in the flowable resin group.

Author Biography

Tabinda Nawaz Khan, Department of Science of Dental Materials, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi-Pakistan

Correspondence:

Department of Science of Dental Materials, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi-Pakistan

Cell: +92 300 232 4728

Email: tabinda.nawaz@duhs.edu.pk

References

1. Baik A, Alamoudi N, El-Housseiny A, Altuwirqi A. Fluoride varnishes for preventing occlusal dental caries: a review. Dent J (Basel) 2021;9(6):64.

2. Khan TN, Khan FR. Evaluation of in situ adaptability of two types of fissure sealants placed with or without enameloplas-ty. J Med Dent Sci Res 2022;10(1):7–11.

3. Kim SY, Song JS, Kim IH, Choi HJ. Frequency of buccal pits and defective buccal pits in mandibular molars of children and adolescents. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2022;49(3):253–63.

4. Pani P, Nishant. Pit and fissure sealants: the stop of the de-mon. 1st ed. India: Book Rivers; 2022.

5. Simonsen RJ, Neal RC. A review of the clinical application and performance of pit and fissure sealants. Aust Dent J 2011;56:45–58.

6. Ng TC, Chu CH, Yu OY. A concise review of dental sealants in caries management. Front Oral Health 2023;4:1180405.

7. Weatherspoon D. Dental sealants and caries prevention. In: Burt B, Eklund S, editors. Dentistry, Dental Practice, and the Community-E-Book. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2020; p.296.

8. Lam PP, Sardana D, Ekambaram M, Lee GH, Yiu CK. Effec-tiveness of pit and fissure sealants for preventing and arrest-ing occlusal caries in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent 2020;20(2):101404.

9. Khan TN, Khan FR, Rizwan S, Nawaz Khan KB, Iqbal SN, Ali Abidi SY. Comparison of the adaptability of two fissure sealants in various tooth fissure morphology patterns: an in vitro experimental study. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2019;31:418–21.

10. Rathi SD, Nikhade P, Chandak M, Motwani N, Rathi C, Chandak M. Microleakage in composite resin restoration: a review article. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2020;9(12):1006–11.

11. Arora RK, Mordan NJ, Spratt DA, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Bacteria in the cavity-restoration interface after varying pe-riods of clinical service: SEM description of distribution and 16S rRNA gene sequence identification of isolates. Clin Oral Investig 2022;26:5029–44.

12. D’Ercole S, Dotta TC, Iezzi G, Cipollina A, Pedrazzi V, Piat-telli A, et al. Static bacterial leakage in different conometric connections: an in vitro study. Appl Sci 2023;13:2693.

13. Qamar Z, Abdul NS, Reddy RN, Shenoy M, Alghufaili S, Alqublan Y, et al. Micro tensile bond strength and microle-akage assessment of total-etch and self-etch adhesive bonded to carious affected dentin disinfected with chlorhexidine, curcumin, and malachite green. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2023;27:103636.

14. Khan TN, Abidi SYA, Khan KBN, Ahmed S, Qazi FUR, Saeed N. Micromechanical intervention in sandwich restoration. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015;25:781–4.

15. Khan TN, Abidi SYA. Comparison of retrograde, primary and secondary bonding materials with tooth substance. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2018;28(1):9–12.

16. Khan TN, Khan FR, Abidi SYA. Ameloplasty is counterpro-ductive in reducing microleakage around resin-modified glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants. Pak J Med Sci 2020;36(3):544–9.

17. Naqvi SS, Abidi SY, Ahmed A, Najmi N, Aghwan MA, Saqib A. Effect of different irrigating solutions on the apical seal-ing ability of resin-based root canal sealer. Ann Abbasi Sha-heed Hosp 2023;28(3):128–35.

18. Bagheri E, Sarraf Shirazi A, Shekofteh K. Comparison of the success rate of filled and unfilled resin-based fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Dent 2022;19:10.

19. Konark Singh A, Patil V, Juyal M, Raj R, Rangari P. Compar-ative evaluation of occlusal pits and fissures morphology modification techniques before application of sealants: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2020;31:247–51.

20. Shingare P, Chaugule V. An in vitro microleakage study for comparative analysis of two types of resin-based sealants placed by using three different types of techniques of enamel preparation. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14:475–81.

21. Saini S, Chauhan A, Butail A, Rana S, Dua P, Mangla R. Evaluation of marginal microleakage and depth of penetra-tion of different materials used as pit and fissure sealants: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13:38–42

Published

2025-03-15

How to Cite

1.
Khan TN, Khan FR, Riaz MF. COMPUTATION OF THE GAP SIZE AT THE MARGINAL INTERFACE OF TWO TYPES OF FISSURE SEALANTS: AN IN VITRO EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 15 [cited 2025 Jul. 19];37(1). Available from: https://www.jamc.ayubmed.edu.pk/index.php/jamc/article/view/13067