EXPERIENCE AND OUTCOME OF VENTRICULAR-ATRIAL SHUNT: A MULTI CENTRE STUDY

Authors

  • Nadeem Akhtar Department of Neurosurgery, Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital, Rawalpindi
  • Adil Aziz Khan Department of Neurosurgery, Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital, Rawalpindi
  • Muhammad Yousaf Department of Neurosurgery, Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital, Rawalpindi

Abstract

Background: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt has been widely utilized in the treatment of hydrocephalus as a safe option but there is recent literature evidence that ventricularatrial (VA) shunt is not as notorious for its complications as proclaimed, to analyse and report our success with this procedure we conducted our study. Methods: A total of 64 patients undergoing VA shunting were included in this case series study conducted at RMC and Allied hospital Rawalpindi. The data was collected over a period of 4 years from, 1st June 2010 to 1st June 2015. Result: Our study included 64 patients who underwent a VA shunt for hydrocephalus. Their age ranged from 25 to 75 years. Most of the patients were females (60%). The following complications were observed with 2 (3.12%) patients having blockage of the shunt at the neck, 3 (4.68%) suffered from glomerulonephritis, 2 (3.1%) had post-operative neck hematoma, 4 (6.25 %) had wound infection, short lower end of the tube was found in 3 (4.68%), migrated lower end (into the subclavian) was seen in 1 (1.56%). Mortality was 1(1.56%). These results were comparable to other studies. Conclusion: Neurosurgeons have been doing a VA shunt as a second procedure, after a VP shunt when the need due to a complication was encountered. We however share our experience regarding ventriculo-atrial shunting, as first choice procedure, because of its low incidence of shunt blockage unlike VP shunt, which has high rate of shunt blockage and therefore warrants repeated surgeries.

References

Chuang HL, Chang CN, Hsu JC. Minimally invasive procedure for ventriculoatrial shunt-combining a percutaneous approach with real-time transesophageal echocardiogram monitoring: report of six cases. Chang Gung Med J 2002;25(1):62–6.

Vernet O, Rilliet B. Late complications of ventriculoatrial or ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Lancet 2001;358(9293):1569–70.

Pal K, Jindal V. Ventriculo cholecystic Shunt in the Management of Hydrocephalus. Indian paediatr 2007;44(6):435–7.

Zhang J, Qu C, Wang Z, Wang C, Ding X, Pan S, et al. Improved ventriculoatrial shunt for cerebrospinal fluid diversion after multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt failures. Surg Neurol 2009;72(Suppl 1):29–33.

Vaidya B, Jha R, Khadka N, Adhikari D, Sharma GR, Bista P, et al. VA shunt in Bir Hospital: Our Experience of 20 Years. Nepal J Neurosci 2014;11(1):22–5.

McGovern RA, Kelly KM, Chan AK, Morrissey NJ, McKhann GM 2nd. Should ventriculoatrial shunting be the procedure of choice for normal-pressure hydrocephalus? J Neurosurg 2014;120(6):1458–64.

Khan F, Rehman A, Shamim MS, Bari ME. Factors affecting ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival in adult patients. Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:25.

Schoenbaum SC, Gardner P, Shillito J. Infections of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and therapy. J Infect Dis 1975;131(5):543–52.

Okoro BA, Ohaegbulam SC. Experience with ventriculo peritoneal shunts at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu. East Afr Med J 1995;72(5):322–4.

Smith ER, Butler WE, Barker FG 2nd. In-hospital mortality rates after ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedures in the United States, 1998 to 2000: relation to hospital and surgeon volume of care. J Neurosurg 2004;100:90–7.

Gonzalez LF, Kim L, Rekate HL, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC. Endovascular placement of a ventriculoatrial shunt. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2007;106(4 Suppl):319–21.

Elhammady MS, Benglis DM, Bhatia S, Sandberg DI, Ragheb J. Ventriculoatrial shunt catheter displacement in a child with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. Case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;2(1):68–70.

Tamburrini G, Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C. Diagnosis and management of shunt complications in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. Rev Neurosurg 2002;1(3):135–40.

Published

2015-12-15

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 4 (2015): Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.

Most read articles by the same author(s)