OUTCOMES OF DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE TREATED WITH DYNAMIC CONDYLAR SCREW

Authors

  • Muhammad Naeem ur Razaq Department of Orthopedics,Ayub Medical college,Abbottabad
  • Taj Muhammad Department of Orthopaedics, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Ashfaq Ahmed Ayub Teaching Hospital
  • Muhammad Adeel Department of Orthopaedics, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Sajjad Ahmad Department of Orthopaedics, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Saeed Ahmad Department of Orthopaedics, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Shahid Sultan Department of Orthopaedics, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad-

Abstract

Background: Implants for open reduction and internal fixation of distal femoral fracture includes angle blade plate, rush nails, enders nail and interlocking nails. But all these devices are technically demanding and less effective in providing inter-fragmentary compression in osteoporotic bones. These problems can be solved with dynamic condylar screw (DCS).The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of different outcomes of distal femoral fracture treated with dynamic condylar screw Methods: This case series study was carried out in the Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad from 1st October 2014 to August 2015, after approval of the ethical committee of the institution. Data of all patients with distal femoral fractures aged 20-70 years, recruited through emergency, OPD or consultant clinic collected on a pro forma. Standard treatment of trauma was given to the patients. Detailed history was taken including the past medical and surgical history. Detailed examination including air-way, breathing and circulation, general physical examination and abdomino-pelvic examination was done in each patient. Investigations including urinalysis, haemoglobin %, full blood count, X-ray (both AP and lateral view) of the involved femur (including hip and knee) was done. Results:  Mean age of the patients was 43.18±14.647 ranging from 20 to 70 years. Mean duration of hospital stay in days was 2.21±1.111 ranging from 1 to 6 days. Patients’ follow-up assessment after 4 months of surgery for union of femoral fracture treated with dynamic condylar screw was found in 96 (94.1%), wound infection was found in 7 (6.9%), knee stiffness was found in 21 (20.6%) and limb shortening was found in 7 (6.9%). Conclusion: Dynamic condylar screw is an easy, scientifically less difficult and satisfying method of treatment for fractures of femur.Keywords:  Distal Femur Fracture, Dynamic Condylar Screw,Internal fixation

Author Biographies

Muhammad Naeem ur Razaq, Department of Orthopedics,Ayub Medical college,Abbottabad

Associate Professor,Department of Orthopedics,Ayub Medical college,Abbottabad

Ashfaq Ahmed, Ayub Teaching Hospital

Department of Orthopaedics And Trauma

References

Anyaehie UE, Ejimofor OC, Akpuaka FC, Nwadinigwe C U. Pattern of femoral fractures and associated injuries in a Nigerian tertiary trauma centre. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18(4):462–6.

Batchelor E, Heal C, Haladyn JK, Drobetz H. Treatment of distal femur fractures in a regional Australian hospital. World J Orthop 2014;5(3):379–85.

Patel A, Sutariya B. Condylar buttress plate for fixation of distal femur fracture: Functional and anatomical evaluation. Int J Medi Sci Public Health 2014;3(5):621–4.

Doshi HK, Wenxian P, Burgula MV, Murphy DP. Clinical Outcomes of Distal Femoral Fractures in the Geriatric Population Using Locking Plates With a Minimally Invasive Approach. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2013;4(1):16–20.

Singh AK, Rastogi A, Singh V. Biomechanical comparison of dynamic condylar screw and locking compression plate fixation in unstable distal femoral fractures: An in vitro study. Indian J Orthop 2013;47(6):615–20.

Ehlinger M, Ducrot G, Adam P, Bonnomet F. Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013;99(3):353–60.

Shulman BS, Patsalos-Fox B, Lopez N, Konda SR, Tejwani NC, Egol KA. Do Elderly Patients Fare Worse Following Operative Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures Using Modern Techniques? Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2014;5(1):27–30.

Iftikhar ali, shahabuddin, Surgical outcome of supracondylar and intercondylar fractures femur in adults treated with dynamic condylar screw, JPMI 2011:25(1):49–55

Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, Maier A, Bühler M, Barraud GE. The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury 2000;31(3):C62–3.

Streubel PN, Ricci WM, Wong A, Gardner MJ. Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469(4):1188–96.

Gwathmey FW Jr, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Kahler D, Hurwitz S, Cui Q. Distal femoral fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18(10):597–607.

Streubel PN, Ricci WM, Wong A, Gardner MJ. Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469(4):1188–96.

Cass J, Sems SA. Operative versus non-operative management of distal femur fracture in myelopathic, non-ambulatory patients. Orthopedics 2008;31(11):1091.

Ali I, Shahabuddin. Surgical outcome of supracondylar and inter-condylar fractures femur in adults treated with dynamic condylar screw. J Postgrad Med Inst Peshawar-Pak 2011;25(1):49–55.

Kao FC, Tu YK, Su JY, Hsu KY, Wu CH, Chou MC. Treatment of distal femoral fracture by minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteo-synthesis: comparison between the dynamic condylar screw and the less invasive stabilization system. J Trauma 2009;67(4):719–26.

Malik I, Khan R, khurana R, Sharma S. Comparative study of management of distal femoral fractures managed by dynamic condylar screw and distal femoral locking compression plate. 2015.

Hakeem A, Khan Nu, Khan MI, ullah F. Dynamic condylar screw (DCS) fixation in treatment of supracondylar fracture of distal femur. Rawal Med J 2010;35(1):45–7.

Shankar PR, Kumar BP, Babu GRS, Sagar SRV. A comparative study of fixation of distal end fracture of femur by supracondylar nail and dynamic condylar screw, J Evid Based Med 2015;(2)4:380–8.

Published

2016-06-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>